Talk:Who Let the Dogs Out

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Annual readership Template:Press

Garfield: The Movie

Dont forget that this song was also in above movie. So who let the dog out


There is also a song called "Who Let The Hogs Out" by the Electric Amish http://www.electricamish.com/ which has been played on the Bob and Tom show. I don't see it on their discography at present. 209.43.9.71 04:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Michael Z. WilliamsonReply

Fair use rationale for Image:Wholetthedogsout.jpg

File:Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Wholetthedogsout.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Mitt Romney

This probably isn't notable enough, but if anyone's interested, Mitt Romney apparently thinks this is a hip and trendy song. http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/01/21/romney-who-let-the-dogs-out/ Reminds me of that McDonalds ad where they used the phrase "I'd hit it" referring to a cheeseburger, not realizing that the phrase means "I'd have sex with it." 153.42.168.174 (talk) 19:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Hangover

This song is in The Hangover

68.117.70.6 (talk) 00:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lyrics

What is the song actually about? 99.247.1.157 (talk) 00:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Who Let the Dogs Out" was also in "Men in Black II". Will Smith returns to the car, where he left his alien partner, a talking dog (a Pug). He discovers the dog singing/barking along with this song. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.92.213.214 (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Who Let the Dogs Out?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Who Let the Dogs Out?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Who Let the Dogs Out?. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Documentary tracing back the origin of the song

Noting in passing that there is a documentary entitled Who Let the Dogs Out wherein a person researched the origins of this song.[1] Interestingly (for navel-gazing purposes), his research began when he tried to find information to add the surname of a person referred to as "Keith" to the Wikipedia article about this song. Risker (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've added this report as an external link. Some of it could probably be incorporated into the article, but I don't have time at the moment. Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Also, an episode of the podcast “99 percent invisible” covers the story: https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/whomst-among-us-let-the-dogs-out/ //Knuckles (talk) 06:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ummm, which is already added as an external link in the article.. saw that just after posting my comment, sorry. Knuckles (talk) 06:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 5 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved Template:Nac (t · c) buidhe 05:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply



Who Let the Dogs Out (song)Template:No redirect – I don't know exactly why this is not at the base name, but it is clearly the primary topic.[2] (CC) Tbhotch 04:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Template:Abot

Feminist song

Besides the reference that was removed without explanation in this edit, with an invitation to discuss this on the talk page (so wait, why do I have to start the discussion when sourced information is being removed together with the source?), also at least one other of the already established references in this article calls it feminist. I am putting that categorization and text back in, as it is not a single source this relies on anymore. Why would we remove the reference from that quote? --denny vrandečić (talk) 21:56, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why do you think it is necessary, or helpful to readers, to insert that claim in the opening sentence of the article - rather than referring to the claim, in a more nuanced and balanced way, in the body of the text? It is not open to dispute that it is a "song". It is open to argument whether it can neutrally be called "a feminist song against catcalling", simply because that is one claim made for it. The song has a very complicated origin and history, and it does not give the correct balance to be too specific about its meaning in the very first sentence of the article. Ghmyrtle (talk) 10:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Songs with feminist themes category

(Following on somewhat from the discussion immediately above) Template:U removed the category Category:Songs with feminist themes, with the comment Template:Tq. I couldn't see a justification for this "actually", so restored it, with comment Template:Tq. Binksternet reverted my restoration, with the comment Template:Tq To avoid the risk of ending up in a revert war, I've brought it here.

As far as I can see the article already had at least two secondary sources mentioning its identification as a feminist song: [1][2] and none saying it is "not actually" feminist.

In case those are inadequate, I've added three more sources: [3][4][5]

So I'm failing to see the "Secondary sources are the defining factor on Wikipedia" argument against including this category - it seems to be several secondary sources agreeing, all I can see against is one editor's opinion of "not actually". Can anyone clarify, or can this category be re-added? TSP (talk) 20:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Template:Reflist-talk

Sorry, I was under the impression that the only support for the "feminist" aspect of the song came from involved people talking about it. Sources such as your linked ScreenRant piece do not wholeheartedly call the song feminist—rather, they relay what was said by Anslem Douglas, the songwriter, and then they distance themselves from the narrative by saying "apparently". But your linked Revelist piece shows career journalist Mandy Velez affirming in her voice that the song is feminist, so that satisfies WP:SECONDARY for me. Binksternet (talk) 22:08, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, re-added. While I think some of the sources like American Songwriter do just report Douglas' opinion, as you say I think Revelist is pretty clear; as is Cracked in its title. And I think I'm correct in reading in Screenrant that the statement at the end "Looking over the lyrics with this in mind, it all makes sense" refers to Douglas' position that it is a feminist song. Anyway, if you're happy, I am too. TSP (talk) 22:29, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  5. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".