Talk:Wedge strategy

Two audiences

I'd like to expand our coverage of how the ID movement (1) reveals the religious nature and purpose of their approach to one audience but also (2) denies that ID is in any way religious to another audience. One place to start would be the "designer". Does intelligent design begin with a premise that life began because it was created (as in Creationism) by The Creator (as in God)? Or does it simply argue that scientific observations lead us to the logical conclusion that cells and organisms show evidence of "having been designed"?

I'd like to see a list of quotations from proponentsists (hee, hee!) acknowledging and boasting about the religious basis of ID. This would look great alongside a similar list of denials, evasions, rationalizations, etc., as they try to promote ID as properly secular and academic - having no connection to Creationism.

To ID opponents, this is all obvious, perhaps, but I'd like to make it more explicit for the reader. --Uncle Ed (talk) 14:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

There are plenty of sources in the articles: for example, Timeline of intelligent design may help. . .dave souza, talk 20:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Wedge strategy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110519124655/http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/intelligent-design.pdf to http://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/intelligent-design.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sunflower.com/~jkrebs/JCCC/05%20Wedge_edited.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.discovery.org/a/2101
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060614003725/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002225932_design31m.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002225932_design31m.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lsj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20050911%2FOPINION02%2F509110732%2F1087%2Fopinion
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150906051325/http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/07/no_one_here_but.html to http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/07/no_one_here_but.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070729032153/http://aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2005/JF/Feat/forr.htm to http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2005/JF/Feat/forr.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Wedge strategy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sunflower.com/~jkrebs/JCCC/05%20Wedge_edited.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060207030634/http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/0605/discovery-darwin.php to http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/0605/discovery-darwin.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060714233945/http://www.6newslawrence.com/news/2006/jul/07/many_question_groups_move_elections_nearing/ to http://www.6newslawrence.com/news/2006/jul/07/many_question_groups_move_elections_nearing/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Wedge strategy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081115032044/http://smu.edu/dedman/viewpoint.pdf to http://smu.edu/dedman/viewpoint.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061206075308/http://www.aclupa.org/downloads/Day6AM.pdf to http://www.aclupa.org/downloads/Day6AM.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051110033847/http://windowview.org/science/arn.files/notinkansasanymor.html to http://www.windowview.org/science/arn.files/notinkansasanymor.html
• Added Template:Tlx tag to http://www.iscid.org/papers/Dembski_DisciplinedScience_102802.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Socks

Noting that Ethanfgrant and Cimerondagert were socks of Allenroyboy. —PaleoNeonate – 07:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Shouldn't Wedge strategy (diplomacy) be the main article?

It seems weird to me that "Wedge strategy" in the Creationism debate has the main article whereas the more widely understood "Wedge strategy" from diplomacy has the (diplomacy) in parenthesis. Shouldn't it be the reverse? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:56, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

I agree with you...I'm guessing that since Wedge strategy (diplomacy) is such a small and undeveloped article that that is the reason...but that doesn't mean it needs to stay that way.---Avatar317^(talk) 01:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)