Talk:Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 April by Johnsontyler415 in topic New Section//Infill Station
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Template:Article history Template:WikiProject banner shell

Untitled

Regarding linguistic features:

1. Is this section truly pertinent?

2. Is it accurate? People occasionally refer to to Metrorail as the subway; I would change "never" to something like "seldom." Also, what is the source for rhyming "WMATA" with "Ramada"? I have been in this area longer than WMATA has been in existence, and I have never heard that usage.

I've always pronounced it that way myself, as do many other people I know. I'm not sure that I've ever heard anybody on the news pronounce it that way, but I'd say it's at least in common usage. I'm not too sure about that sample sentence for using Metro as a verb, though. I don't typically use it as a verb myself - and I don't know many people who do - but if I did it wouldn't be in such a generic sentence. -Etoile 14:47, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I pronounce it WMATA all the time. Schuminweb 04:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
For a short time, announcements over the public address system would prounounce "WMATA" to sound like "Ramada," and then only when referring to the website, wmata.com. This practice stopped -- thankfully -- when they obtained the metroopensdoors.com domain. Perhaps this happened because unless you knew that Metro was operated by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, you'd have no idea how to spell "WMATA." (Womatta? Wamada?) (Fredo 29 June 2005 21:07 (UTC))
The customer service phone system recordings also referred to the website as "www.wmata.com" even after MetroOpensDoors.com was registered. It now reflects the new address, however. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.239.80.167 (talkcontribs)

Web Links

As Metroopensdoors.com shows a short introduction and then redirects to WMATA.com, I feel it is redundant to have both links on the Wikipedia page. Schuminweb 04:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Names

I have trimmed and copyedited the "names" section in the article to make it more concise, and removed the part that talks about why the "metropolitan" in WMATA.

The reason for the term "Metropolitan" instead of "city" in the names of many Washington, D.C. organizations (such as the Washington D.C. police, the Metropolitan Police Department, or MPD) is that Washington, D.C. is technically not a city, for obvious political reasons. Template:Talkfact

I'm not entirely sure the reason given below for "metropolitan" in WMATA. I actually think it has more to do with how WMATA funding is spread across the regional jurisdictions, and that for political reasons "washington metropolitan" was preferred over "national". I don't have a citation for this off the top of my head, but can look for one. -Aude (talk | contribs) 19:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Purple Line

The Purple Line is not intended to go around the beltway-it will actually cut very close to the border of DC at parts (just after Silver Spring it will be less than a mile from the border), and will connect (as directly as possible) Bethesda > Silver Spring > New Carrolton, which will keep it many miles from the beltway. That, and the Purple Line isn't even being discussed as an actual Metro extension (they're leaning towards BRT, but the best we'd get is Light Rail). Does anyone object to these changes? -Rmeskill 18:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for File:WMATA Metro Logo.svg

File:Nuvola apps important.svg

File:WMATA Metro Logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


The use of the mark is "fair use" because it is a reference to the owner of the mark or the owner’s services. The trademark (more likely a service mark, but "trademark" is a good descriptor) is not using the term for purposes of source identification and the use does not imply sponsorship or endorsement by the service mark owner. In this case, the reader is likely to be aware that reader is probably looking at a Wikipedia page and that it is possible that Wikipedia is not really an operating division of WMATA. ( :

Unitacx 14-May-2018 —Preceding undated comment added 16:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Impacts of the 2008 financial crisis

Can somebody please explain the leaseback scheme in more detail? (Also, today the judge will be issuing a ruling.) 69.140.152.55 (talk) 15:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Metro and Belgian bank, KBC Group, reached a settlement on November 15, 2009 to end a long-term leasing deal after nearly three days of talks in federal court.

The agreement benefits the riders of our system and taxpayers of this region,” said Metro General Manager John Catoe outside of U.S. District Court. “Metro no longer faces the immediate threat of cuts to our capital budget and a downgrading of our credit rating.” All parties agreed not to discuss the terms of the settlement. KBC Group was seeking an immediate $43 million payment from Metro after the credit rating of insurer, American Insurance Group, was recently downgraded. The downgrade put the deal in a technical default and allowed the bank to seek payment because AIG had guaranteed the agreement between KBC and Metro. Metro had asked a federal judge to temporarily bar the bank from collecting payment. The judge urged a compromise after hearing arguments at a Wednesday court hearing. “It sends a strong message to other banks that they cannot make a financial windfall at the expense of transit riders,” Catoe said. The case was being closely watched by financial institutions and other transit agencies that have received similar demands from other banks. Metro has 14 similar lease agreements with financial institutions. Several banks have threatened to put the agency into default under the agreements unless Metro finds additional high-rated insurance coverage of the deals now that AIG’s credit rating has been downgraded. Metro and a group of 30 other transit agencies have asked the Treasury Department or Federal Reserve to back the insurers’ guarantees of the deals. “We’re asking the federal government to guarantee the insurer’s credit rating,” Catoe said. “This would be at little to no cost to the federal government, and the transit agencies would no longer be in technical default of the contracts.” The chief executives of several major transit agencies will join Metro on Capitol Hill Tuesday urging Congress to legislate a provision in the economic stimulus bill to require the Treasury Department to back AIG and other insurers’ credit ratings. 72ChevyNova (talk) 15:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority/GA1 Talk:Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority/GA2

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

“Controversy” section

The NTSB report on the June 2009 Washington Metro train collision mentions a lack of a “safety culture” at Metro. This is often summarized in the media as a lack of prioritization of safety concerns at the agency; however, I think that is incorrect. Although the actual report does not say this in so many words, what I think it is referring to is an overemphasis on punitive discipline as the primary means to enforce safety and an underemphasis on system engineering improvement – but I have no sources for my interpretation. Any input? 97.34.217.59 (talk) 13:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Involvement in DC Circulator

I can’t find a source confirming that WMATA is involved in the development or operation of the DC Circulator. (This question came up in a work context for me.) Can anyone else? Richmintz (talk) 15:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, Circulator says WMATA was involved in the origination. They don’t seem to have any involvement now in either operation or governance, but i don’t think it rises to the level of needing an edit. Richmintz (talk) 15:18, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority/1}}

Wiki Education assignment: Composition II Section 2

Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment

— Assignment last updated by OliviaH150 (talk) 23:49, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

New Section//Infill Station

Johnsontyler415 (talk) 03:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Hello, I am the student who chose to do this artcle for school work, What I did was add a new section under the history tab titled, "Infill Stations", let me know what changes I can make or if it belongs on another part of the artcle.Johnsontyler415 (talk) 03:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Johnsontyler415 (talk) 03:34, 7 April 2025 (UTC)Reply