Talk:Warsaw, Indiana
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Warsaw, Indiana Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Improve sourcing
I'm surprised this article received a B for quality. Although generally well written it is largely unsourced and makes numerous unsubstantiated statements including aspects as fundamental as current population estimates. Let's look for sources before making these kinds of statements. 67.167.110.28 (talk) 00:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
- I agree, there are "citation needed" tags all over, half of the references are the standard one in the infobox. I reassessed it as C-class for this reason. CRwikiCA (talk) 09:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Tatoo Comment
Moved a negative comment from 184.0.64.250 here. If this is to be included, it should extend Warsaw,_Indiana#Law_and_government and not culture.
Warsaw also feeds in to the stigma of intolerance in Indiana by banning the word "Tattoo" from its advertising. <ref>http://news.bmezine.com/2011/05/27/modblog-news-of-the-week-may-27th-2011/#more-33075</ref>
Original research
Can't include this in the article because it's original research (and, I have to be honest, research of no value whatsoever), but here it is anyway: Warsaw, Indiana is the geographic center of the Big Ten Conference. Mrgate3 (talk) 18:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Assessment comment
Template:Substituted comment Substituted at 10:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Reversion
I'm curious why the link to Wikimedia commons was reverted? I'll stop putting in links if they're not desirable in articles. I assumed that access to the additional media would be desirable. Curious! --Chris Light (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)