Talk:Viscount Cobham

Untitled

Umm... There seems to be something wrong - there are only 10 people listed, but the current incumbent is the 11th Viscount. Who have we missed off?
James F. (talk) 12:49, 17 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Ah, I see that this has been fixed. However, is the 11th Viscount Cobham really John William Leonard Lyttleton, not John William Leonard Lyttelton?

And what's up with Peerage of the United Kingdom - it says that the current Viscount has also been awarded a Life peerage of Baron Lyttleton; presumably this is distinct from Baron Lyttelton?

James F. (talk) 10:33, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)

---

The 3rd Viscount should be listed as 2nd (not 1st) Earl Temple. Donald Renouf, 8th May 2004, 4.52 pm (BST)

Hmm. No idea why the page was protected. Have now both unprotected and corrected.

James F. (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2004 (UTC)

Viscount Palmerston

A question has arisen on Gen-Medieval over the evidence saying that the Viscounts Palmerston are related to the Temples of Stowe. So I've added a {{fact}} tag there and if anyone has a cite please <ref> it. Thanks. Wjhonson 16:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

---

I've updated the external link from, http://www.dukesofbuckingham.org/, to http://www.dukesofbuckingham.org.uk/, as they have moved. Thanks. --M2o6n0k2e7y3 (talk) 20:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Line of Succession

1. Hon Richard 1949 brother of the current viscount
2. Thomas 1986 son of Richard
3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:54E4:B01:F535:EF98:4304:F636 (talk) 18:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)