Talk:Vardøhus Fortress

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 May 2025 by Quinoa Grain in topic guts and blackpowder
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

Untitled

Have made several edits to this which do not show up. Be patient - I'll try again when it is responding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Williamborg (talkcontribs)

And that edit was made way back on 17:48, 22 May 2005. The changes were subsequently made. Williamborg 00:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fables

There are some nationalist fables here. No reference about the Norwegians (or Swedes?) "collecting taxes from Russians" in Kola. I don't believe that Godunov (who was not a tsar in 1597) asserted that Finnmark was "from ancient times a perpetual patrimony of the Czar". In such cases, the Russian monarchs normally referred to the rights of the Republic of Novgorod, of which the tsar considered himself a sovereign, or "grand prince". --Ghirla-трёп- 08:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Actually, the Danish-Norwegian king maintained a claim on the Kola peninsula up the second half of the 16th Century. The people (mostly Sami) living in the far north were at times taxated by three rulers, the Danish-Norwegian king, the Swedish king and the russian czar. I've studied this at university. Could did up some sources, but I'm unsure were to find English language ones. Manxruler 23:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
History is comprised on many nationalistic interpretations (as well as other special pleading). We'll do our best to determine "what to do" to fix the text and "who to blame" (in this case it is indeed Godunov - or perhaps his councilors). See rewrite for more detail with specific references. If it doesn't resolve your concerns, please provide alternate references. Williamborg (Bill) 00:05, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

guts and blackpowder

this is a location in the videogame guts and blackpowder perhaps we could add something on the page relating to this can some people reply if you think this is a good idea or not Timetocheese (talk) 00:46, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I really enjoy this game, but I don't think it is nearly relevant enough to warrant a section on a Wikipedia article CCCyanide (talk) 12:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
yea true, but I think if it gets on a news article it COULD appear, but we don't know yet so yea Thomasthetankenginefan123 (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
How about adding the game to the appropriate "popular roblox games" page instead of vandalising articles such as this when you've been told not to like 100 times by now, at least there you're not really ruining anything. Quinoa (talk) 16:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply