Talk:Unit 101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 December 2017 by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:ArticleHistory Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:ArbCom Arab-Israeli enforcement

POV

Article is deeply non-NPOV. Needs to be gone over.

- I agree. This is definitely written with an extremely biased POV.

Deaths: Qibya massacre says over 50. This article says almost 70. How many were there? TomCerul 13:21, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This article seems like a stub which needs some serious editing --Anton Adelson, Western Australia 21:00, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)


Excised this odd "Reference" which listed no actual source or authority:

"It was top secret" / Yosef Argaman p.19

--LeFlyman 13:40, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Qibya is also commonly spelled "Kibya" and occasionally "Qibieh" in numerous publications.

This article is rubbish; it is disgusting in its anti-Israel bias

Benny Thomas is a notorious Israel basher. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.190.207.155 (talk) 21:42, 13 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

taking a look at the home site of the group in hebrew and making a comparisment with the highly POV article used most for this title, i believe we should look for originals and less POV sources who seem to be citing their own sources in a non academic way to support their pretext... once we can get a few proper sources, we can get rid of this non-encyclopedic and even defamatory source. Jaakobou 10:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Also why is this under the Palestine project? This is an article about an Israeli unit shouldn't it be under the Israel project? --Hadees 03:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unit 101 was an infamous terrorist group masquerading as a counter-terrorism unit. The article should reflect that. 71.203.209.0 (talk) 19:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

El-Bureij attack

The article says: "The mission was to kill Col. Mustafa Hafez, the chief of Egyptian intelligence in the Gaza Strip who stood behind many of the early violent infiltrations into Israel.", without giving a source. Yet the Zionist historian Yoab Gelber writes: "In the end of this first month, a patrol of the unit that infiltrated into the Gaza Strip as an exercise, encountered Arabs in al-Burej refugee camp, opened fire to rescue itself and left behind about 30 killed Arabs and dozens of wounded.". Now this Gelber is quite a pro-Israeli historian, so I have no reason to doubt his reliability here and I have put his version in the article. --JaapBoBo (talk) 21:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

He is not a Zioniste historian. He is an Israeli historian.
And he is not pro-Israeli, he is Israeli.
Ok for the remaining.
Ceedjee (talk) 08:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK, Ceedjee. We all have to be careful on this kind of topic to stay as neutral (encyclopedic) and cool in our talks as possible. Poppy (talk) 10:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Salut Poppy,
Please no 'false symmetry' :-)
I should stay more cool but there is no issue between me and npov.
JaapBoBo is extremally cool but there is nothing but issues between him and npov. Ceedjee (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Unit 101/GA1

"Enemy Citizens"

Perhaps it is an overly philosophical point, but I'd appreciate a little discussion on the phrase "killed dozens of unarmed enemy citizens"; particularly the final two words. Civilians who aren't contributing to a war or conflict aren't necessarily enemies. They are non combatants whose feelings toward another state are unlikely to be accurately stated by a generalization of this sort. If we assume all citizens of warring states are enemies, then there isn't much reason for uniformed soldiers to avoid directly engaging them.

I do hope you'll forgive my emphasis on my personal perspective here, but the sentence would be easy to change in a manner that both addresses my concern and maintains the facts originally presented. ~Artoro 30 December 2009 —Preceding undated comment added 14:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC).Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Unit 101. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Unit 101. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Unit 101. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply