Talk:Union Movement
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Union Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080402004743/http://www.oswaldmosley.com:80/misc_documents/ombfe.htm to http://www.oswaldmosley.com/misc_documents/ombfe.htm
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20051230182140/http://www.oswaldmosley.com:80/um/um.html to http://www.oswaldmosley.com/um/um.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Racial tensions and the return of the Union Movement
Just a note to mention that the clashes between ethnic groups have been misidentified as " a new phenomenon in Britain". The first recorded is the 1919 race riots: http://www.open.ac.uk/researchprojects/makingbritain/content/1919-race-riots — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.156.79.22 (talk) 08:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Overreliance on Oswaldmosley.net?
A source that the introduction of this article and its first two paragraphs lean on almost exclusively is oswaldmosley.net, a website ran by former UM organizer Robert Edwards on behalf of the European Action. From a cursory glance it does not provide accurate historical information; for instance, it makes bold claims about conspiring Jews, stockbrokers, Tories and and communists undermining Britain from within, providing no sources for its own claims. I can appreciate such a source for basic claims, but I cannot help but feel slightly queasy at using such a coloured source to make claims such as that the UM is "described as post-fascist". It being described as post-fascist by their own successors, in my opinion, does not a balanced account make.
That said, with my limited research time, I could not find sources that either confirm or contrast this and other claims made in the first two paragraphs about the UM's political leanings, profile and mission. T-Nod (talk) 17:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)