Talk:Uma Bharti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 31 October 2019 by Winged Blades of Godric in topic Sources
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

Untitled

Hi

This page was vandalised reverted it back to the last edit

Lalit Shastiri

Hi sources for information on this page is taken from the archives of Indian newspapers please add freely to this page do not vandalise

Richard Charlesworth

The quality of langauage right now is awful...The page was much better a month back. I am removing the reference of her being a dalit. Uma Bharati is a Lodhi Rajput, which comes under OBC category and not SC. The reference being sighted only has a meaningless one liner regarding her

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

POV tag

This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do not discuss apart WP:TPG

Please avoid to put information on talk pages or anywhere on Wikipedia, that is unacceptable and falls under

for more awareness about how to behave at talk pages, please go for WP:TPG --Dr.pragmatist (talk) 07:16, 15 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Political Career

There is no section about Bharti's Political career; how on earth was that not the first thing written? I will try to create one. Does anybody have suggestions/comments? Vanamonde93 (talk) 12:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sadhvi

Doesn't sadhvi just mean a female sadhu, which she is anyway? Why is this controversial? Kautilya3 (talk) 18:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Well yes, but where's the controversy? The IP removed it; I reinserted it, and duplicated the ref. Feel free to tweak the language. Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Uma Bharti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Sources