Talk:Tripitaka Koreana

Electronic version available?

There is an (at least one) electronic edition of the TK on CD (or DVD, dont know). The one I have seen seems to be named (beside Korean characters):

Tripitaka Koreana 2004

COPYRIGHT@2004 by The Research Institut of Tripitaka Koreana

I could still not find any way to get this, or even more information, an ISBN or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.60.117.55 (talk) 12:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

What language is the name?

What language is the name "Tripitaka Koreana"? Is it Latin, Sanskrit or something else? 98.110.10.64 (talk) 03:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Tripitaka is Sanskrit, Koreana is a Latin adjective form based on a borrowed place name. Of course the language of the text is Chinese... AnonMoos (talk) 01:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

RfC: Are texts written by Buddhist writers and teachers that explain basic Buddhist concepts reliable secondary sources?

The RfC by Dorje108 states that:

"I propose that texts written by Buddhist writers and teachers that explain basic Buddhist concepts should be considered secondary sources as long as they meet the criteria specified in the guidelines (regardless of whether or not the writer has Western academic training). Do you support this?"

Please see: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Buddhism

Robert Walker (talk) 14:54, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Tripitaka Koreana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ocp.go.kr/english/treasure/dom_hae.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206141217/http://www.buddhapia.com/buddhapi/news/campaign/haeinsa/e_p10.html to http://www.buddhapia.com/buddhapi/news/campaign/haeinsa/e_p10.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090506052257/http://www.ocp.go.kr/english/treasure/dom_hae.html to http://www.ocp.go.kr/english/treasure/dom_hae.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

this article strains credulity

How can anybody read this without realizing it's almost certainly a nationalist series of lies? such superlatives, such ridiculous claims, such implicit faith! They were damaged as soon as they were removed from their old home? they have survived 750 years in mint condition? they are the most important Buddhist corpus? give me a break! 2607:FEA8:AA03:9600:B943:EACD:F2A2:197F (talk) 23:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)