Talk:Treaty of Devol
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Treaty of Devol Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Short
Changed 1054 (??) to 1097, the correct year. 13 Nov 2005
- Thanks...that was some leftover vandalism from June 22-23, when it was on the main page. Adam Bishop 19:07, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
Fixed it, but no idea what was going on 24 June 2005
Have just checked the source text and the date in the first line (when the crusade started) is listed as 1054 1054 but comes out on my browser as 1654 - is there a fault? 24 June 2005
Is there a mismatch in the dates i.e. 1100's for the treaty then taliking about 1600's in the next paragraph, possibly a typo? 24 June 2005
Isn't this a bit too short to be a comprehensive FAC? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:49, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- How do you suggest it be made more comprehensive? Adam Bishop 22:17, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- An FAC doesn't have to be lengthy. This article seems to be very comprhenisve for something done in the 1100's. Falphin 18:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
219.130.58.19 has blanked this page numerous times today (Thu 23 June (EST))
Whoever has access to the encyclopedia/map from where the image was scanned, please scan it in in a much larger resolution and don't compress it so much (on this image the JPEG effects can be seen...)
Picture
Is there some picture for beginning of article?--Vojvodae please be free to write :) 10:49, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Treaty of Devol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101202171936/http://doaks.org/publications/doaks_online_publications/Crusades/CR09.pdf to http://www.doaks.org/publications/doaks_online_publications/Crusades/CR09.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
WP:URFA/2020 notes
I am informally reviewing this older featured article as part of WP:URFA/2020, an intitiative to revitalize wikipedia's older featured articles. There are some citation needed tags that have been in the article since 2022, and the use of ancient sources in the manner used in parts of this article is not how current featured article standards would support their use. For instance, "Neither copy survives. It may have been written in Latin, Greek, or both. Both languages are equally likely given the number of westerners present, many of whom would have known Latin. It is not clear how far Bohemond's concessions were known across Latin Europe as only a few chroniclers mention the treaty at all;" should not be cited solely to Fulcher of Chartres. Additionally, the Holifield student paper would be unlikely to be accepted as a high-quality RS in a featured article candidacy in 2025. Hog Farm Talk 20:36, 23 February 2025 (UTC)