Talk:Tiffany & Co.

1. REDIRECT Template:Archives

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

File:Sciences humaines.svg This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 4 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tiffellington.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Yes , supported .

Is this a stock company?

Is it possible to buy stocks/shares "Tiffany & Co." to buy ? sanks195.244.167.108 (talk) 15:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Article has a lot of advertising language and non-notable inclusions

It's easy to acknowledge that an article on luxury goods is bound to have some fluffy wording and insignificant-but-flowery details, but much of this page is not encyclopedic. Cate Blanchett's turquoise necklace in the 2015 Academy Awards is not notable. Social media campaigns about being a for-realsies-global-citizen-do-gooder are not notable. Because of these factors I will be tagging this page as an advert. Mewnst (talk) 08:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

I agree completely and thank you for working on this. I have cut some small bits here and there but the article could use a good going-over. GA-RT-22 (talk) 12:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Tiffany and Co. x CFDA Jewelry Design Awards

Hello @Graywalls

I noticed that my recent edits to the article on the Tiffany and Co. x CFDA Jewelry Design Awards were reverted, and I’d like to discuss this further. My intention was to improve the article by adding more recent philanthropic activity from TCO. My stance is the award is a new and notable aspect of Tiffany's philanthropic activity.

I understand that Wikipedia has guidelines for verifiability, neutrality, and sourcing, and I believe my edits align with these principles. However, I’d appreciate your feedback on what specific issues led to the reversion. Was there something in particular about the sources I used or the wording that you felt didn't meet Wikipedia's standards?

I’m open to working together to find a solution that adheres to Wikipedia’s guidelines and improves the quality of the article. I look forward to your thoughts.

Best regards Crash0ut (talk) 01:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

This is not something that belongs on an encyclopedia when it's your editorial discretion to introduce such things using sources related to the award grantor or recipient. See WP:ABOUTSELF and WP:PSTS. This counts as unduly self-serving (serving of the company or the award giver). We're not here to read what the company wants to say and articles shouldn't reflect what the company wants to present. Please keep restoring it. Seek consensus if you believe it should be included, per WP:ONUS. Graywalls (talk) 01:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Ok, I'll update with a citation from NYT. Thanks! Crash0ut (talk) 01:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Would you also like to go to CFDA talk page to discuss edits there as well? Crash0ut (talk) 01:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Some advice has been provided here [1] in relation to the relevant edit. Axad12 (talk) 08:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA24 - Sect 200 - Thu

— Assignment last updated by MyeonD (talk) 00:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)