Talk:Through the Looking-Glass
Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "Message box".
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Through the Looking-Glass Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config Template:Archives User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
Peer review
{{Wikipedia:Peer review/Through the Looking-Glass/archive1}}
Plot sections
The Manual of Procedure (MOS:NOVELPLOT) specifies a plot summary of 400–700 words. The one for this article submitted at the FAC runs to 1,100 words. The MoS states that editors wishing to have a plot summary longer than the recommended 700 words should "be prepared to explain why on the talk page". This is my reasoning. Each of the chapters of the book, except for the brief chapters 11 and 12, is a self-contained episode, similar to a short story. One could provide a short synopsis of the whole book, describing the broad sweep of the plot – a dreamt chess game where the heroine meets nursery-rhyme characters – without detailing the characters and events in each story but I do not think that would be useful to the reader of the article. It would not, in my view, give the reader a clear idea of the contents of the book. Tim riley talk 14:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- I think that's a solid approach. The MOS is flexible on the length point, given there are always going to be works that can't (or shouldn't) be constrained by the hard word count. This is one, I think, where a little leeway should be allowed. Without it, it would be a very simplistic description that does not aid readers in their understanding.- SchroCat (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- It works, it's well written, it doesn't feel excessively long. I agree that cutting the plot down to <700 words would disproportionately deprive a reader of helpful information. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:01, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the trouble to post your rationale. I agree with SchroCat and Gog the Mild that this falls within MOS:NOVELPLOT exception that "Very occasionally, there may be exceptional reasons that warrant a longer summary." MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:46, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Colleagues, I'm grateful to all three of you for your encouragement. Tim riley talk 13:15, 9 June 2025 (UTC)