Talk:The Space Museum

Tricky grammar

"Richard Shaw, who spoke with a Cockney accent, was cast as Governor Lobos and asked to deliver his lines with a BBC accent instead."

From this formulation, was Shaw asked to used a BBC accent or did Shaw request that he play Lobos with a BBC accent? There's no way to know. Now, if we go with the more awkward construction of:

"Richard Shaw... was cast as Governor Lobos and was asked...."

then it is clear that the decision was not his.

-- Proteus71 Sept 15 2005 17:40 GMT

Fair use rationale for Image:The Space Museum2.png

File:Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:The Space Museum2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Space Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080530162224/http://www.gallifreyone.com/episode.php?id=q to http://gallifreyone.com/episode.php?id=q
• Added Template:Tlx tag to http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~ecl6nb/OnTarget/1987/space/87space.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

35mm?

really?

seems a bit unlikely...

duncanrmi (talk) 08:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Template:Reply Care to elaborate? – Rhain ☔ 09:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

sure. a quick glance at the main dr who article suggests that budgets were extremely tight for this show, & it was sometimes aired live. the show was recorded on monochrome 2" videotape when it was going to be edited afterwards, but if this was archived at all (& often, infamously, it wasn't), it would have been on 16mm.

almost certainly there was no 35mm during studio production or archiving of this show, though imdb asserts that some vfx shots were 35mm.

duncanrmi (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Template:Reply Yes, the model shots were filmed on 35 mm. No, the show was never aired live. – Rhain ☔ 22:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Release dates

This article says the serial first aired from 24 April to 15 May 1965. However, the official Doctor Who website states that it aired from 8 May to 29 May 1965. There's no source in the article, so maybe it should be changed to what doctorwho.tv says. Spectritus (talk) 08:21, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Apparently, it's a mistake on doctorwho.tv. Spectritus (talk) 09:51, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Definitely appears to be the case—and, to clarify, there is a source in the article. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 11:30, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Sources are so easy to find:

I see complete agreement with our article text. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)