Talk:Spirited Away
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spirited Away Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:Article history Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Annual readership Template:Refideas User:MiszaBot/config
About the plot summary again
Hey 101.119.152.63, thanks for your additions to the article! Unfortunately, your changes to the plot summary take it over the 700-word limit recommended by WP:FILMPLOT. Would you be able to condense the content so it is once again below this threshold? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 08:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
genre of the material viewed 49.146.42.170 (talk) 12:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- ? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- If the plot is too long then I suggest reverting back further to a version that is shorter. -- 109.76.138.72 (talk) 01:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Five paragraph long lead section also seems excessive. The WP:LEAD section is supposed to summarize. -- 109.76.138.72 (talk) 01:28, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
About the reverts
Hey Nyxaros, your rollback of the IP editor's changes was not appropriate. They had made good-faith contributions with descriptive edit summaries, which cannot be indiscriminately reverted as "Template:Tq". I've restored their edits for now, and I'd recommend that you have a discussion with them here if you disagree with them on any of the changes. Thanks! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Next time read the article before writing responses like this. ภץאคгöร 06:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- I read through every diff; it seems they went back on their decision for the lead once, but their changes were constructive overall, and certainly not vandalism worthy of a rollback. I would still appreciate an explanation from you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment
{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Spirited Away/1}}
Post GAR discussion
As no attempts were made to get it back to GA status during the time the GAN was opened despite multiple WikiProjects being notified and there were any barely responses, I think we should start a new plan to get the article back to GA standards.
If there are any suggestions on what we should do, please post here. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:02, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- I think the points I brought up in my GAR nomination would be a good place to start if you'd like to improve the article. I don't have particularly nuanced comments for improving the article in this state, and I don't see a path back to GA that doesn't involve a top-to-bottom rewrite based firmly in the scholarly sources. Unless someone beats me to it, I might get to that someday as part of my project to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Ghibli-related topics. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)