Talk:Song
- REDIRECT Template:Protection padlock
Template:Rcat shell Script error: No such module "Message box".
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Song Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Message box".Template:Template other Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Script error: No such module "Distinguish". Template:Annual readership User:MiszaBot/config
more appropriate cover image?
Would some sheet music not be a more appropriate cover image than a singer? just get some uncopyrighted sheet music, like that for a nursery rhyme DParkinson1 (talk) 14:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think there's anything wrong with the current image, personally. A human singing is probably more universally understood than some sheet music—especially because understanding sheet music requires specialized knowledge that most readers lack. Just my $0.02. Woodroar (talk) 21:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Many songs have not been transcribed into staff notation. Sheet music is notoriously incapable of specifying all the nuanced aspects of live performance; the best that can be expected is a sketch of the sound created by the singer interpreting the notes. Nothing wrong with Ms. Holiday's picture here. Just plain Bill (talk) 21:54, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
About Our Lead Section Here...
So yeah, before I registered, I edited this page but got reverted.
Because, I feel like its preposterous, that EVERY SINGLE dictionary defenition of the word "Song" that I could find contains a form of the word "Sing", including Wiktionary.
Let's look at every single dictionary defenition of the word song:
Cambridge: a usually short piece of music with words that are SUNG
Merriam Webster: the act or art of SINGING
Dictionary.com: a short metrical composition intended or adapted for SINGING, especially one in rhymed stanzas; a lyric; a ballad.
OED: the act or art of SINGING; vocal music; that which is SUNG.
Google: a short poem or other set of words set to music or meant to be SUNG.
Wiktionary: A musical composition with lyrics for voice or voices, performed by SINGING.
So WHY does this article's lead sentence not have a variation of the word "Sing" when its pretty much clear that SINGING is required to make a SONG and besides this word is used in every single dictionary defenition. Even Wiktionary knows.
Cheers, LoverOfAllAnimalsActivist LoverOfAllAnimalsActivist (talk) 16:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @LoverOfAllAnimalsActivist! It's important to remember that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so our articles need not (and in most cases should not) resemble one. Our Manual of Style on the lead section, particularly the section on the first sentence, says that we should write a concise overview of the subject, written for a non-specialist, and which stands by itself—which suggests we avoid anything that is circular or self-defining. Defining "song" with the gerund form "singing" does a disserve to our readers, by sending them off to read a different article rather than helping them here.
- But maybe I'm wrong. If you have suggestions for ways to phrase the first sentence that keeps readers on the page, I'm all ears. I'm also interested in comments from other editors. Woodroar (talk) 17:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)