Talk:Sikorsky HH-60 Pave Hawk
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sikorsky HH-60 Pave Hawk Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Specifications, range and ferry range
Hey in the article the Specifications are:
"Range: 504 nmi (580 mi, 933 km)
Ferry range: 441 nmi (507 mi, 817 km)"
The Ferry range is always the largest range possible for any type aof Aircraft, afaik? Especially Jets or bombers use internal and/or external fuel tanks to increase the range, the weapons are dismounted for that use if possible or no ammo is carried, also the crew is reduced to the minimum to increase range? Greetings 08:04, 8 June 2025 (UTC) Kilon22 (talk) 08:04, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- The '441' figure was added in this edit by a blocked user prone to making these types of mistake. Odd as 441 is not a figure in either of the cited sources, I have restored the information immediately prior to that edit which is from the more informative of the cited sources, the other cites 500 miles which agrees. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 10:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ferry range is generally the max range an aircraft can reasonably do. So this lower 441 nmi value seems dubious. -Fnlayson (talk) 18:00, 8 June 2025 (UTC)