Talk:Shajar al-Durr

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 17:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

---

• Shajarat al-Durr → Shajar al-Durr —(Discuss)— Even though there are sources using the current name, the proposed name is more widely used. Here is a Britannica web page. —Chapultepec 00:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Copied from WP:RM Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:09, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

name

• Shajar al-Durr is the correct name. The name and the title of the article should be corrected . The other name Shajarat al-Durr is not correct name though it is used by commons, but it can not be used in encyclopedia.

Samsam22 09:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

---

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support per nomination. --Chapultepec 20:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

• Support Samsam22 10:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

todo

• intro has nested parenthesis which should be avoided if possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RJFJR (talk • contribs) 18:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Name Changed

• HiChapultepec .. I see name corrected.thank you. I will edit this article later. Regards

Samsam22 20:25, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

• • You're welcome... =) --Chapultepec 20:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Intro/significance

The intro seems to underplay her significance. RJFJR 16:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Feel free to expand it.  :) Be bold. --Elonka 18:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

• expanded Samsam22 (talk) 23:02, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Very poorly written

This article would FAIL an English class. It's so poorly written, probably, because it was written by someone whose first language was Arabic and not English. There is also a question about sourcing. Where did the date of Nov 22 come from, for example?Ryoung122 09:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Lu'lu

article says: ... Badr ad-Din Lo'alo'a the Ayyubid Emir of al-Mousil.... Wrong!. The name most used is Badr ad-Din Lu'lu, atabeg of Mosul (or al-Mawṣil). He was atabeg of the zengids, and of course it was not ayyubid.--88.16.142.62 (talk) 19:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Shajar al-Durr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111215221257/http://www.tarihinpesinde.com/sayi06/16.pdf to http://www.tarihinpesinde.com/sayi06/16.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)