Talk:September 11 attacks

Name

Since everyone calls it 9/11, why don't we call it that or "9/11 attacks" 107.201.182.97 (talk) 18:29, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Because in some places that could be read as 9th of November. Slatersteven (talk) 18:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Outside the US, 9/11 would be read as November 9th. Most news sources also refer to the event using "September 11th" and very rarely 9/11. It makes complete sense the Wikipedia article would, therefore, read "September 11". Butterscotch5 (talk) 19:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2025

2601:602:D285:9540:54CA:77F1:A142:A8F4 (talk) 07:18, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

I want to add something that was incorrect.

File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2025 (2)

CheeseGuy223 (talk) 07:21, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

I need to fix something there was something incorrect.

File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — Czello ^(music) 07:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Help me

I taught I can add a new thing to Wikipedia but it’s wrong place oh what the hell Adf636 (talk) 02:24, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2025

Template:Edit semi-protected Remove the word "Islamist" from the opening paragraph. Thank you in advance. 92.40.195.21 (talk) 22:11, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

File:X mark.svg Not done: Remsense ‥ 论 22:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Add additional newfound information.

Template:Side box

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

New information suggests Israel was behind the attacks. This is NOT a conspiracy theory. This is facts. A video explains it all: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aic8E6Oypuk CentralWikiCommander (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Youtube is not an RS. Slatersteven (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Youtube is a reliable source. The streaming platform doesn't matter when seeing if it's a reliable source or not, it's the video. The video I linked is a journalist covering injustices in the Muslim world for more then 10+ years. Watch the video first, then reply back with your concerns. CentralWikiCommander (talk) 21:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

NO it's not here. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:37, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

??? CentralWikiCommander (talk) 21:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

It's not a RS here on Wikipedia for this claim. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:03, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

YouTube is not a Reliable Source Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:39, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Who said YouTube is not a reliable source? Why does the type of streaming platform matter, its the video that matters. CentralWikiCommander (talk) 21:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Scroll to the bottom of this Page Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources Destinyokhiria (talk) 21:46, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

The channel is a verifiable source, according to the page you linked me too. therefore, the video should be put for review if it can be used as evidence to add on to this page. CentralWikiCommander (talk) 15:10, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Youtube is not a reliable source! Plus, it makes no damn sense either. Why the hell would Israel want to attack us? They're our ally, and their issue is with Palestine, not the greater Arab world. If they've wanted to do so according to your logic, don't you think they would've done it since October 7 of 2023? Enough of these conspiracy theory nonsense, especially concerning Israel. Butterscotch5 (talk) 13:48, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

You are correct, Youtube is not a verifiable source, but your talking in a pro-Israel way. You are supposed to remain un-biased.. The channel I linked is a VERIFIED channel, a journalist with a huge reputation for stating only facts. And last I checked, it is allowed to link these channels for review. I can also tell you why Israel wanted to attack us, but that would take too long, Just search up "The 5 dancing Israelies". It'll explain everything. CentralWikiCommander (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

This is, in fact, a conspiracy theory. — Czello ^(music) 15:11, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

It was, In fact, a conspiracy theory, however the video a linked, from a VERIFIED channel, a journalist, explains very clearly with Israel and ties to the 9/11 attacks. CentralWikiCommander (talk) 15:14, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

I think, after the video I sent, clearly explains how Israel has ties to 9/11, should be official, and added into the Wiki page on 9/11 CentralWikiCommander (talk) 16:22, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Based on a YouTube video put out by a person whose channel description says Template:Tq? Hard pass. This will not be added and I'm closing this section. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:28, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.