Talk:Satellite temperature measurement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 January 2020 by Jlevi in topic Withdrawing merge proposal
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".


User:MiszaBot/config

User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Satellite temperature measurements. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

RSS rev 4

G updated the RSS [1]. I think that corresponds to http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0768.1, which is worth mentioning of itself (see-also https://www.carbonbrief.org/major-correction-to-satellite-data-shows-140-faster-warming-since-1998). Thanks C William M. Connolley (talk) 14:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

That edit changes .135 to .184. But the journal ref provided above says .134 increased to .174. " The changes result in global-scale warming (global trend (70S-80N, 1979-2016) = 0.174 C/decade), ~30% larger than our previous version of the dataset (global trend, (70S-80N, 1979-2016) = 0.134C/decade)" Perhaps the .135 and .184 figures include Jan 2017? Do we have a ref for the .184 figure? If not, should it be changed to .174 per journal ref or is that for a different period or coverage or something? https://web.archive.org/web/20170120235652/http://www.remss.com/measurements/upper-air-temperature shows .135 to Dec 16 and https://web.archive.org/web/20170302132317/http://www.remss.com/measurements/upper-air-temperature also shows .135 for period to Feb 17 so .01 diff in trend for one month between that 2 month gap seems unlikely. crandles (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.html shows .184 but this may include up to May 2017 but is 70S to 82.5N as opposed to journal article referring to 70S to 80N. crandles (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Satellite temperature measurements. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge MSU temperature measurements into this article

This article seems to cover nearly identical material as the MSU temperature measurements article. I propose we should merge that article into this one. Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

On more consideration, I'm withdrawing the merge proposal. See next section.

Withdrawing merge proposal

Thinking it over, my thought is now that we should cut the MSU material here to just an introductory overview, and put all of the details and discussion of trends into the MSU temperature measurements article. This will serve the purpose of the merge (not having the same material duplicated across multiple articles), and also will mean that this article is not unbalanced with too much material on the MSU, and comparatively little on other satellite temperature measurements.Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC) / revised 11 Jan 2020Reply

I have now moved a large part of the discussion to the MSU article. Right now no text has been deleted only moved. Next I am going to go to the MSU article and start cutting the duplications (which are many). Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 14:35, 11 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sounds reasonable! Jlevi (talk) 14:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)Reply