Talk:Sangh Parivar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Stt

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Template:Contentious topics/talk notice Template:TmboxTemplate:Template other Template:Indian English Template:WikiProject banner shell User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 October 2022

Template:Edit extended-protected

122.161.76.12 (talk) 11:46, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please remove militant word from bajrang dal

File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit request

the whole topic is protected. Alright, understandable. But passages like this provide equal weight to proponents of the ideology (who are not scholars or very good sources on the matter) as it does to the established scholarly opinion on the matter. This is POV and establishes a false epistemological dichotomy. I'll reproduce the passage I want edited.

"The political opponents of the Sangh Parivar have often termed Sangh Parivar's concerns about cultural intrusion by the Western commercial interests as 'Rightist'.[1] David Frawley argues that the cause is similar to that of native and tribal people all over the world, like Native American and African groups trying to protect their native cultures.[2]".

I suggest the reference to Frawley and the 'information' attributed to him should be disregarded and thus removed. Freyheytlid (talk) 20:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC) Freyheytlid (talk) 20:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Yes check.svg Done. Deleted the whole section. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Freyheytlid (talk) 11:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Template:Reflist-talk

Babri Mosque Demolition

The paragraph regarding the BABRI MOUSQUE DEMOLITION only includes criticism from UPA (now I.N.D.I.A.). It ignores the Supreme Court ruling and statements given by RSS and NDA affiliated persons. Fierce Phoenix (talk) 15:30, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Members of the Sangh are called Swayamsevak, not Sanghi

The claim of "Members of the Sangh Parivar or the supporters of its ideology are called Sanghis." is wrong. Sanghi is an informal word, while Swayamsevak is the official term as per all the members of the Sangh Parivar

India2024 (talk) 19:20, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I tweaked the wording to indicate the informal nature. (It is not synonymous to "Swayamsevak". Check the citation.) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
This is Wikipedia, you should use the formal official terminologies. The formal, official, and explicit recognised term is 'Swayamsevak'.
Kangana Ranaut is not a credible source of information. Also, a news article of Entertainment genre isn't suitable citation for a serious Wikipedia page about a socio cultural organization. India2024 (talk) 14:32, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 March 2025

Template:Edit extended-protected Adding Suruchi Prakashan to the list of Sangh Parivar organisations. This publishing houses publishes RSS literature and is also headed by a RSS leader. [3] Bakarpuran (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Yes check.svg Done Warriorglance(talk to me) 07:06, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  1. Script error: No such module "Footnotes".
  2. Hinduism and the Clash of Civilizations/David Frawley. New Delhi, Voice of India, 2001, xiv, 247 p., Template:ISBN.
  3. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/hedgewar-celebrated-nehrus-lahore-declaration-went-to-jail-for-freedom-hosabale-9191223/