Talk:Samford University
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Samford University Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Notable Alumni Cumberland Law
Rania Majors 35 years of representing any, and everyone in Philadelphia committed activist, and community leader. She is on the ballot to become a judge, and join the ranks of your prestigious University. 2601:41:4301:46E0:34FE:EB81:176:D913 (talk) 07:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Questioning revert
This revert did not provide an appropriate edit summary or rationale. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Samford_University&diff=prev&oldid=1265765355
The edit summary was "unnecessary." However - nothing on wp is necessary. Not event the article.
It was an appropriate change that was reverted, however. 184.153.21.19 (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is unnecessary to have a long list on article A, when a more inclusive list on the same topic can be found on article B. Just direct readers on article A wishing to read the list...to article B. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello and the best of holidays to you. I'm not sure you happened to notice my above note on the use of the word "unnecessary" here. I hope you are enjoying the holiday season. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 21:14, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Magnolia677 that a comprehensive and detailed listing that duplicates an existing category or list article is not necessary in this article. It's much more helpful to provide a summary of the existing category or list article and a link. ElKevbo (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's of course interesting. Please point me to a wp rule that states that anything on wikipedia is necessary. You as well seem not to be referring to the point that I've made twice above. I recognize that the two of you are experts. Happy holidays. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2024 (UTC)