Talk:Salmon Trout River
Latest comment: 15 May 2007 by Djoeyd114 in topic
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
The statements included on the main page give the appearance of bias against the proposed mining operations. How can we reword this to keep a neutral point of view? Imzadi1979 17:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see a POV issue here. Sulfide mining can cause the type of polution described, and Kennecott is proposing to build a mine in the region and use the river for drainage. It seems pretty straightforward to me.StudierMalMarburg 22:00, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think I have fixed the POV issue, the old POV was very pointed and NOT neutral. Djoeyd114 23:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)