Talk:Salience (language)
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Whoever wrote this article is obsessed with paper and torque!
Definition could use some improving imo.
Relevance?
I have wikified the lead to make the definition a little clearer. The first two paragraphs of the discussion section seem irrelevant to the topic of salience. Anyone agree? BenC7 06:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Crano section?
Shouldn't the Crano section be merged with the Communications Studies part ? (Or just be removed, as it is partly redundant with it ?) IMHO, a separate section with biographical information is just misplaced here, in particular as there are many models and applications of different conceptions of salience in different disciplines of linguistics and neighboring fields that cannot be listed here for reasons of brevity. Chiarcos (talk) 03:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Dr. Booth's comment on this article
Dr. Booth has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Booth has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
- Reference : Alison Booth & Patrick Nolen, 2012. "Salience, Risky Choices and Gender," CEPR Discussion Papers 659, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.