Talk:Rob Glaser
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Untitled
I have a problem with this statement: His products have recently lost a great deal of market share to Microsoft's Windows Media Player.
...for the following reasons:
- It's vague. Did RealRhapsody lose market share to WMP? Did Microsoft Word lose marketshare to WMP (Rob managed that product many moons ago)? How much is "a great deal"?
- It's not relevant. Why put this in Rob Glaser's bio? Why not put it in the article about RealNetworks, since I'm presuming its RealNetworks' products that are the question?
- It's not NPOV. "Great deal" is subjective.
I'm a longtime RealNetworks employee, so I'm not going to say much more than this on the subject. However, it would be nice if this went away. -- RobLa 05:50, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Rob Glaser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080207133013/http://www.time.com:80/time/digital/digital50/41.html to http://www.time.com/time/digital/digital50/41.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
the old net worth figure seemed way too high
from recode 2014: "Glaser still owns 37 percent of RealNetworks, which was worth $10 billion at its peak in early 2000, just before the Web 1.0 crash. It now has a $282 million market valuation." So, 37% of $282m is $104m at the time of that article but now in 2016 RNWK's market cap is $155m so 37% of that is $57m — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.108.54.119 (talk) 16:59, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rob Glaser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.time.com/time/digital/digital50/41.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312060557/http://www.glaserfoundation.org/program_areas/global_hiv.asp to http://www.glaserfoundation.org/program_areas/global_hiv.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Glaser is not a billionaire
the citation (shown currently) from Forbes magazine 20 years ago in the height of the .com boom is not evidence of Glaser being a billionaire in 2018. Glaser was removed from the Forbes list of the wealthiest when the RNWK stock price collapsed in the .com crash more than 15 years ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.7.192.88 (talk) 16:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)