Talk:Resurrection of Jesus
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Resurrection of Jesus Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell User:MiszaBot/config
First to see resurrected Jesus
The first to see Jesus after his resurrection was Mary of Magadala. 65.186.177.151 (talk) 03:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- No one did or could have seen Jesus after his resurrection, since that's an impossible event that didn't happen. The only claim that can be made is that "according to ... such-and-such happened", with appropriate citations. 2600:8802:5913:1700:61DC:AFDA:4675:4765 (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Bad grammar
Does anybody else realize that this sentence lacks a subject?
In secular and liberal Christian scholarship asserts that religious experiences, such as the visionary appearances of Jesus and an inspired reading of the Biblical texts, gave the impetus to the belief in the exaltation of Jesus as a "fulfillment of the scriptures," and a resumption of the missionary activity of Jesus's followers.
I think the word "Christian" could be changed to "Christianity", and then "scholarship" would become the subject of the sentence. But as it stands, "In secular and liberal Christian scholarship" is a prepositional phrase, and the sentence has a predicate but no subject. Kk.urban (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
- Just drop the word "In". 2600:8802:5913:1700:61DC:AFDA:4675:4765 (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I’m working on improving this page and you’re welcome to join in!
Updating with 2020 OUP textbook next (haven’t been able to find 2023 edition on short notice). AintItFunLiving (talk) 03:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
- Good luck. By the way, you need to point out the POV issues in this thread too, as mandated by the POV template itself. StephenMacky1 (talk) 15:16, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Notes section
Template:U - in this edit you made seen here, where you changed sfn to harvtxt, you have now created another cite error seen here - Cite error: A list-defined reference has no name. (see the help page). This Cite error will continue to be listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting until the error is fixed.
As the help page explains in Issues and resolution - More than one use of Template:Tlx or #tag:ref within list defined references. You can only use Template:Tlx or #tag:ref once as a list-defined reference. This bug has been a known issue for a while now, and is being tracked in Phabricator task Template:Phab Nested refs fail inside references block. So you can either move the note back into the body of the article like it was previously was to resolve this known issue, or figure out your own workaround to this known issue. Thanks in advance. Isaidnoway (talk) 05:47, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Isaidnoway thanks for noting; I'll find a fix. Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:12, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
- Gotcha! :) Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:40, 31 May 2025 (UTC)