Talk:Rehabilitation Project Force
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rehabilitation Project Force Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Image requested User:MiszaBot/config
RPF (Labor Camp) is no more
Source: Aaron-Smith Levin - YouTube video around June 5th 2023. Of course CoS could reinstate it anytime or reform it and call it something else. Asherkobin (talk) 06:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- I, too, have heard this, but I have no reliable source to cite so it's not in the article. Grorp (talk) 07:45, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
- The same unreliable source now says that it is back. Se Yiou tube video FlZYz4dVRWE --Guy Macon Alternate Account (talk) 03:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Not surprised. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 04:48, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- The same unreliable source now says that it is back. Se Yiou tube video FlZYz4dVRWE --Guy Macon Alternate Account (talk) 03:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Graduation requirements
This source[1] used in the article has a good description of the "formula" of confession or "success story" required before being allowed to "graduate" from the RPF. Probably should be incorporated into the article. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 20:23, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
The RPF's RPF
"Sea Org members newly assigned to the RPF who do not want to be on the RPF are first assigned to the RPF's RPF until they choose to join the RPF. When an RPFer messes up, they are assigned to the RPF's RPF"
Seriously? That's the clearest explanation we can come up with? --Guy Macon Alternate Account (talk) 03:12, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- The problem is coming up with reliable sources that aren't just more primary sources authored by Hubbard. Here are some primary sources you can read, and if you want to use them go for it: from the cited Scientology dictionary, and page 1 page 2 page 3 of Flag Order 3434 titled "THE RPF's RPF". ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 05:28, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
- Wow. That Flag Order 3434 is pretty much the hardest thing to understand I have read all year. This is going to be impossible to rewrite without it becoming OR (sad trombone sound). How about this: Turn the unclear RPF's RPF section into a (still unclear) direct quote from Hubbard? Would that work? --Guy Macon Alternate Account (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I gave a whack at the section. See if it makes more sense now. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 20:30, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
- Much improved. Thanks! --Guy Macon Alternate Account (talk) 01:41, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".