Talk:Rabeprazole
Template:Academic peer reviewed
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rabeprazole Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Reliable sources for medical articles Script error: No such module "Message box".[[Category:Script error: No such module "good article topics". good articles|Rabeprazole]] Script error: No such module "Message box".
How about some citations?
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Mind adding some citations? Nope. Who cares? After all, this is just Wikipedia, a safe house for self-proclaimed experts, right? I don't think so. It might even be said that this article is completely made up by fellow Wikipedians to preach some sprt of "ass effect" propaganda? So I suggest you guys try to add some reference to support your claims, just as I am doing right now. And that "ass effect" thing is very peculiar. What a marvellous piece of slang! Roshu 08:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roshu Bangal (talk • contribs)
Overhaul
Just an FYI: I am reworking major changes to this article. I hope to have them finished by next week. ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 02:07, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Done! Let me know what you think.―Biochemistry🙴❤ 23:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- While the article is in OK form, it relies on the review from 1999 so is not really ready for GA review. The MHRA label is from 2013 and would be better to use more. I looked at pubmed and PMID 22928894 appears to be the most recent review on this drug from 2012, and isn't cited. It should pass GA fine once the refs are updated and sources checked against them. Jytdog (talk) 02:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for searching for that review; I'll have to take a look at it. Do you recommend trying to remove and replace the older information then, or just citing on top of it? ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 03:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Generally see what the newer says the same or different; if the same just replace with the newer ref (to save someone from doing the same exercise later) and if different, change the content and cite the newer. generally older refs should just fall away... Thanks for your work on this! Jytdog (talk) 07:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- You're welcome! My edits are complete. Thank you again for the advice! ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 00:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Looks great, except for the huge picture of the bottle of Aciphex which is just going to draw the ire of all the generics people and doesn't add a lot of value. i would take that out... Jytdog (talk) 03:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- Generally see what the newer says the same or different; if the same just replace with the newer ref (to save someone from doing the same exercise later) and if different, change the content and cite the newer. generally older refs should just fall away... Thanks for your work on this! Jytdog (talk) 07:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for searching for that review; I'll have to take a look at it. Do you recommend trying to remove and replace the older information then, or just citing on top of it? ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 03:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)