Talk:Queen mother

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 22 April 2025 by Celia Homeford in topic Earliest English usage
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

In re "Queen Mother" in India

Rajmata [sic] is currently translated in the article as "Mother of the State", with the justification that 'Raj' means 'State'. However, the technical term for state/kingdom is actually 'Rajya'. Furthermore, the actual term for the King (or, rarely, if at all, Queen) Mother is "Rajamata" [IPA: rɐmt](note the missing 'a' in the term in the article). This is technically from the same word in Sanskrit, which itself is a Sanskrit compound "राज्ञः माता या सा राजमाता।" (Translation: "She who is the King's mother is the King-mother". The translation here has the appearance of stating the obvious, but it gramatically defines the compound word in terms of the simple words whose place and meaning the compound word takes).

Basically, I think that the translation "Mother of the State" is inaccurate, with the inaccuracy being caused by the inaccurate term 'Raj' [IPA: r] inaccurately being confused with 'State' due to lack of accurate Sanskrit transliteration of the word 'Raja' [IPA: rɐ] in "Rajamata" in the first place. The accurate term is, thus, "Rajamata", and the accurate translation is "King-Mother". Viv73 (talk) 05:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Earliest English usage

The sentence “The term has been used in English since the early 1560s” does not make sense because the sovereign then was Elizabeth I and her mother died in 1536; no one could have been Queen Mother in the early 1560s. Please edit the sentence to name the person for whom the term was first used and to clarify whether the person was Queen Mother at the time or previously. 47.144.47.200 (talk) 23:57, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

That would have been Catherine de' Medici, as is clear from the citation in the footnote. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)Reply