Talk:Privatization
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Privatization Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Annual readership User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
We should put the opinions from IGM Forum European Economists
Absolute Majority agreed about Privatization in Eastern Europe which was strong Positive Some economists wrote down "this is No brainer" I think this source is useful http://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/privatization-in-central-and-eastern-europe Shfur0306 (talk) 12:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
- Privatization unquestionably allowed corruption to take greater hold in eastern europe. The mechanism is obvious: while state capitalism implied concentrated corruption intranationally, privatization allowed corruption to flow into these countries internationally.
- Eastern europe is not filled with miracle economies like the spanish miracle or the chinese miracle. The contrast should be obvious, and it would have been famous otherwise. Houseratz (talk) 15:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Why no mention of how privatization is imposed upon poorer countries?
There is a specific mechanism created by IMF, World Bank and USA to impose privatizations on the poorer countries, it even has an article here in wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Consensus
So, why is there no mention here? This article is like as if privatization is a matter of taste. It's not! 79.166.6.229 (talk) 22:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)