Talk:Porsche 356
Latest comment: 23 December 2024 by Mr.choppers in topic Possibly inaccurate image description
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Porsche 356 Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Possibly inaccurate image description
Moving this note to talk, I have no opinion on it: Template:Tq
cc Mkp20000, see Wikipedia:Accuracy_dispute#Disputed_statement for how to tag these. ℰmi1y⧼T·C⧽ 04:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know the answer. However, the article says changes occurred in early 1957. The 1957 US model year must include 1 Jan 1957 and would cover mid-1956 to mid-1957. So a car built in late 1957 or very early 1957 (ie before the changes in early 1957) would be called a 1957 model year by an American and a car built slightly later (mid-1957 to mid-1958) would be called a 1958 model year. This could be a possible reason for the dating issue. Stepho talk 10:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I took the photo and thankfully I noted the chassis number, 82948. A quick internet search brings me to this Bonhams auction for the very car, which identifies it as having been built on "the last day of January, 1957". I have removed the note. Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)