Talk:Pashto
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pashto Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 November 2024
Template:Edit extended-protected Karachi has only 2.7 million Pashto speakers meanwhile Peshawar has 4.4 million so Peshawar is the largest Pashto speaking city Khadijakhan222 (talk) 07:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rainsage (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
'No real need to develop a Standard Pashto'
As David MacKenzie notes, there is no real need to develop a "Standard" Pashto: "The morphological differences between the most extreme north-eastern and south-western dialects are comparatively few and unimportant. The criteria of dialect differentiation in Pashto are primarily phonological. With the use of an alphabet which disguises these phonological differences the language has, therefore, been a literary vehicle, widely understood, for at least four centuries. This literary language has long been referred to in the West as 'common' or 'standard' Pashto without, seemingly, any real attempt to define it."
The quote does not contain the claim that 'there is no real need to develop a "Standard" Pashto'. This seems to be a conclusion made by an editor from the things that the quote does say. What the quote says is that, for various reasons, it has been possible to have a written Pashto literary tradition without a Standard Pashto. This does not automatically mean that it would not be better to have one or that new needs do not require it. Unless MacKenzie does say that there is no such need somewhere else in the cited text, the claim itself should be removed. Anonymous44 (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
really long legs that go on for miles. Hey! I’m a tall guy and well, long legs really do it to me and a nice ass and let’s not forget the breasts oh and we might as well round my perfect girl up with lips, hair I can grab in my fist and eyes that just make you want to get lost in them and never come up for air. So, while Aza might not have been my ideal girl, she more than made up for it with her s
180.94.79.186 (talk) 23:49, 19 June 2025 (UTC)