Talk:Particle physics
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
|
Script error: No such module "InfoboxImage". |
Archives: Script error: No such module "Archive list". |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than Template:Th/abp Template:Th/abp may be automatically archived by [[User:Template:Th/abp|Template:Th/abp]]Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character "[".. | |
Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia Assignment
Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
— Assignment last updated by Timbenuka (talk) 03:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Future section?
@Drbogdan Are plans and speculation notable aspects of particle physics? News about plans? Do we want to have research proposals from groups doing particle physics? Grant proposals? Etc. I say no, only verifiable information about particle physics here.
It seems reasonable to mention the P5 group but the details of the P5 group belong on Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect Template:Reply to
Template:Redirect category shell (and others) - Thank You for your comments - yes - *entirely* agree - no problem whatsoever - whatever is finally decided is completely ok with me - Thanks again for your comments - and - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 17:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I moved your paragraph into the P5 page where it nicely filled in a blank spot in the TOC! Johnjbarton (talk) 17:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Subatomic particles section
The first part of this section not only uses a different style of writing, but contains several factual inaccuracies - in particular in combination with the table. Consider removing the first two paragraphs, the table, or updating both the text and table to reflect information from other articles. 194.166.214.235 (talk) 11:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
common name for nuclear and particle physics?
what's the common name for the scientific field that comprises nuclear and particle physics? and for the field including the formation of molecules (but not the interaction of molecules which would be chemistry, right? but chemistry could be seen as a subfield of physics because it deals with the structures and processes formed by the 'weak force'...)? "physics of the smallest" (vs physics of the biggest = cosmology) would be wrong, because the topic includes energy, and the reach of which is definitely not small... "physics of matter and energy" would include chemistry (and as a subdiscipline biology...). thanx. HilmarHansWerner (talk) 13:45, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- This topic is covered in Physics and in Chemistry. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)