Talk:Paranthropus boisei

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 March 2025 by Drsruli in topic Lack of Paranthropus in Hominin timeline
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Category handlerScript error: No such module "Copied". Script error: No such module "Message box".[[Category:Script error: No such module "good article topics". good articles|Paranthropus boisei]] Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

Paranthropus

If this information is not all currently at Paranthropus, it certainly should be. --Wetman 4 July 2005 09:30 (UTC)


There were many important factors I added such as how Paranthropus boisei had the largest sexual dimorphism and their comparison to modern day Gorillas, you did not have to delete that. --Quena@sympatico.ca 04:24, 15 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

"Males weighed 68 kg (150 lb) and stood 4 feet 3 inches (1.3 m) tall, while females weighed 45 kg (100 lb) and stood 3 feet 5 inches (1.05 m) tall. The average adult males were almost twice the weight and height as the females, giving them the greatest sexual dimorphism recorded of all identified hominins. "

Correct me if I'm wrong, but something's wrong with that math.--NotALizard 11:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image

File:AustralopithecusBoiseiParis.JPG
Australopithecus boisei.

An image from the Muséum national d'histoire naturelle. Feel free to insert it in the article. PHG (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

This page absolutley needs references to it's discovery and subsequint place as the missing link. It was added to textbooks and a few years later the Leakey's came out saying they had made a mistake. And then the animal was placed back where it actually belonged as a non-human, low land vegetarian primate. That information would be essential, one would think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.38.126 (talk) 05:13, 27 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Paranthropus boisei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:13, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Paranthropus boisei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

chart colours ...

Can someone make the color for the Austro' timeline a darker yellow? It's so light it is hard to see on a white background. Thanks. 104.169.18.0 (talk) 22:42, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

species name

Needs a reference about the change away from the Leaky designation, and why the most-recent rules about the original naming convention does not apply? (aka Brontosaurus-Apatosaurus) 104.169.18.0 (talk) 22:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Paranthropus boisei/GA1

Co-existed with H. erectus?

This article posits that H. erectus and P. b crossed paths within a few hours of each other: https://apnews.com/article/fossil-footprints-early-humans-coexistence-f785102d487f7402421a269cac439ae6 Kdammers (talk) 23:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Lack of Paranthropus in Hominin timeline

Why include a Hominin timeline in this article that doesn't include a mention of Paranthropus boisei, or any member of the genus Paranthropus for that matter? 76.189.135.48 (talk) 03:49, 10 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Paranthropus may be invalid and it may actually be Anthropithecus. Drsruli (talk) 02:50, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

"predominantly abrasive C4 plants, such as grasses"

Since most grasses are not C4 plants, then why does this follow? Drsruli (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply