Talk:Oscar Wilde

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 May 2025 by Viriditas in topic Re: San Francisco visit
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Message box".

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:ArticleHistoryTemplate:Annual readership User:MiszaBot/config

  1. REDIRECT Template:Archives

Template:Rcat shell

Greatest playwright of the Victorian era?

The phrase “Regarded by most commentators as the greatest playwright of the Victorian era” has been added to the first paragraph. In my opinion, only completely uncontroversial statements should be included in this paragraph. I do not consider this particular statement uncontroversial. Firstly, the citation is to one book by Frankel. Frankel does express the opinion that Wilde is the greatest playwright of the Victorian era, but this is one person’s opinion. Therefore “most commentators” is unjustified. Secondly, Frankel can hardly be considered neutral on this point: he is a Wilde scholar. There may well be scholars who specialise in other playwrights who would differ. At the risk of complicating the picture, I will also mention that this is a retrospective judgement: Wilde was not considered superior to his peers at the time, and although he may be considered superior to them today there is a risk that in stating he was “the greatest” readers will be led to believe he was also considered the greatest in his lifetime. Tamara Gardens (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Re: San Francisco visit

Template:Tq

I think the quote can be shortened (paraphrased) to make way for an expansion of the famous party Jules Tavernier and Joseph Strong held for Wilde at the old offices of the California Supreme Court in the Montgomery Block in 1882. At the time, Tavernier and Strong were living there together with both of their families.[1]. Or, I could leave the quote as is and add the material. Viriditas (talk) 21:22, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've left the relevant source and material for others to look at and add if they so desire. I'll check back here in a week or so to see if others (such as the primary contributors) have decided to expand the section based on this material. If not, and nobody has commented, I will go ahead and add it. Viriditas (talk) 00:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
It occurs to me this entire visit (and party) could be turned into its own article but I don’t have access to Wikipedia Library to do so (it has access to all the original coverage). If others do, here’s your chance. Viriditas (talk) 01:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Template:Reflist-talk

  1. Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".