Talk:Opposition to LGBTQ rights

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 April by Andrewa in topic Requested move 6 April 2025
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Template:WikiProject banner shell User:MiszaBot/config Template:Tmbox

Synonyms

In the list of motivations for the movement we list both bigotry and religion. Aren't these two synonyms? Religions tend to teach their adherents to hate other people, and to discriminate in their behavior towards others. Dimadick (talk) 08:24, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

You'd need to specify from what to what you want changed. If you're agrument is to get rid of the word religion, I would oppose because its not commonly accepted that bigotry equals religion. If you are wanting to make an argument that relgion equals bigotry, as 2603:6011:2C00:3C5:3FD6:F17B:55EB:1EAB (talk) 03:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

First sentence

Per MOS:LEADSENTENCE, "If the article title is merely descriptive—such as Electrical characteristics of dynamic loudspeakers—the title does not need to appear verbatim in the main text." This is basically the situation we're in. "LGBT rights opposition" is not a standardly-used phrase; a quick Google search suggests that most of the places using it are quoting this page. A newspapers.com search finds zero uses of the phrase. As such, we shouldn't be spending that first sentence defining that phrase. Instead, I suggest something like "Opposition to legal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people exists throughout the world." -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good. Zenomonoz (talk) 00:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Anti-LGBTQ+" listed at Redirects for discussion

File:Information.svg The redirect Anti-LGBTQ+ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Template:Slink until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 6 April 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 01:14, 15 April 2025 (UTC)Reply


LGBTQ rights oppositionTemplate:No redirect – Per WP:COMMONNAME; see [1]. Ringo62 (talk) 23:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Note: WikiProject Human rights, WikiProject Politics, WikiProject Conservatism, WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, and WikiProject Discrimination have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPathtalk 00:43, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • Support -> the article would benefit from this better title.
Northern-Virginia-Photographer (talk) 16:18, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.