Talk:Opal Koboi

Sources?

One of the main arguments for the attempted deletion of this article was a lack of sources. I'm sure that many of the contributors to this article also !voted "keep" in the recent AfD. In order to avoid the article being relisted, sources really should be found and added as soon as possible. AniMate 06:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Good show

The article's looking much better now that it's been sourced and very well written. I do love a well-written article. And a sourced one for that matter. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 11:56, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually on second thoughts, it's a bit too citation heavy. A lot statements are re-used time and again and some are used to re-enforce statements that have already been verified. Citations are perfectly nice but too many can get in the way while editing. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree. You shouldn't have more than 2 citations next to each other, or it clutters the article. That's a manual of style guidline but I don't recall specifically where it is or I'd link it. You really shouldn't need more than 2 citations per sentence anyway. Trim this one down a bit. --IllaZilla (talk) 21:45, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Good idea. --Jupiter Optimus Maximus (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Opal Koboi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141211012839/http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA512568.html to http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA512568.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)