Talk:OPEC
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the OPEC Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Template:Article history Template:WikiProject banner shell
Template:Mbox User:MiszaBot/config
Unsubstantiated extraordinary claims
These two sentences "However, since 2020, OPEC countries along with non-OPEC participants had helped in stabilising oil markets after the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a collapse in oil demand. This has allowed oil markets to remain stable relative to other energy markets that experienced unprecedented volatility" are used to contradict peer-reviewed research that notes that OPEC members frequently renege on their commitments and that members would do what they do even in the absence of an OPEC agreement. The source, a CNBC story dated April 2020, does not substantiate any of the text in those two sentences and does not in any way contradict that OPEC members frequently renege on their commitments and would do what they do even in the absence of an agreement. The two sentences should be removed, as they are WP:OR, WP:UNDUE and also recentist. Thenightaway (talk) 02:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed Czarking0 (talk) 04:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- File:Yes check.svg Done and thanks. I restored your verison Czarking0 (talk) 04:22, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
