Talk:Northern pintail

Breeding male

The article says "The breeding male is unmistakable." but it doesn't describe how the male is unmistakable. Please describe the physical characteristics of the breeding male. --psyphyre 00:15, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

So what about dafila acuta? Peter Scott would be disappointed at its omission JMcC 09:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyedit Review Notes

I just gave the article a copyedit, and while I won't review it for GA, I have a few sentences and such that I thought could be clarified:

The first sentence of the second paragraph of the lead needs to be rewritten.

Under Description, next to last paragraph, could you elaborate on "with slightly swept-back wings"?

Third paragraph of Threats, should you clarify what quarry species means for us non-hunting folks?

And in Taxonomy, what precisely is Stephens 1824? I don't see it referenced again in the article.

Other than this, I think it looks pretty good. Obviously, go over my copyediting to make sure I didn't accidentaly change the meaning of something. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 03:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, all makes sense, Jimfbleak (talk) 06:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks good to me now. Rufous-crowned Sparrow (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Good Article review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): File:Symbol support vote.svg b (MoS): File:Symbol support vote.svg

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): File:Symbol support vote.svg b (citations to reliable sources): File:Symbol support vote.svg c (OR): File:Symbol support vote.svg

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): File:Symbol support vote.svg b (focused): File:Symbol support vote.svg

   I did notice that you chose not to include a section of cultural significance this time, but it's certainly not a sufficient reason to claim the article is lacking broadness. Some people dislike them anyway.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: File:Symbol support vote.svg

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: File:Symbol support vote.svg

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): File:Symbol support vote.svg b (appropriate use with suitable captions): File:Symbol support vote.svg

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: File:Symbol support vote.svg

   You bird folks are getting too good, I hardly have anything to complain about ;). I made some structural and image adjustments myself quickly, but the prose and referencing definitely meets GA standards. Congratulations! VanTucky 00:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

consistency

The use of in in. and inches is inconsistent. Same comment for other abbreviations of units. Randomblue (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

fixed Jimfbleak (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Extinct subspecies?

Is the subspecies mentioned here valid? http://extinct-website.com/extinct-website/product_info.php?products_id=1111 FunkMonk (talk) 22:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

It appears not, but I've added a sentence anyway Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:49, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Comment

The following sentence is not entirely clear: "In the Palaearctic, breeding populations are declining in much of the range, including its stronghold in Russia, and are otherwise stable or fluctuating." Does "otherwise" mean: "in other regions"?. Suggested revision: "In the Palaearctic, breeding populations are declining in much of the range, including its stronghold in Russia. In other regions, populations are stable or fluctuating."

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mottled Duck which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:00, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Northern pintail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.basc.org.uk/content/nontoxicshot
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/general/news/story?id=3200913
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://ducksrus.bu.edu/~msoren/pubs/AnimBehav2000b.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Male northern pintail at Llano Seco.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for October 26, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-10-26. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 10:56, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Template:Flatlist

Other languages

The Finnish language article "Jouhisorsa" about this critter points to this one in the other languages popup menu. But not the other way around. Unless I am very blind today. 85.76.110.27 (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)