Talk:North Dakota

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 February 2025 by 2600:8806:9024:6C00:51BC:FBB7:95D4:BDB3 in topic European exploration and colonization
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".Template:Section size Script error: No such module "Message box". Template:OnThisDay

  1. REDIRECT Template:Archives

Template:Rcat shell User:MiszaBot/config

North Dakota Statehood Challenge?

Related video: https://www.youtube.com/IJrOMvgu8sQ

Basically, because of the language in the US Constitution, there's a serious challenge to whether North Dakota was legally a state until 2012, when the state corrected the issue. Shouldn't this topic be relevant to this article? 2601:147:4100:B90:119D:608B:F62D:841B (talk) 14:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

2022 American Values Atlas Data

Hi, Template:Re.

  • Click "list"
  • Scroll down.

The data is there. There's a glitch (on some devices?) where it says N/A. KlayCax (talk) 18:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Data:
White evangelical Protestant: 21
Mainline Protestant: 28
Hispanic Protestant: 2
Other non-white Protestant: 1
White Catholic: 28
Jewish: 1
Buddhist: 1
Unaffilated: 12
New Age: 6
21 + 28 + 2 + 1 = 52 for Protestantism. KlayCax (talk) 18:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Religion Graph

The graph for the religion section is extremely confusing, it lists New Age being 6% of the religion and sites this American Values Atlas. There are almost no New Age institutions with that big of a traction within this state, and then the paragraphs accompanying it site the Pew Research Center which was the old graph and was much more accurate to the states demographics, so what is this new graph then? Los Pobre (talk) 19:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

The 2020 PRRI study (National overview) just has "Another religion" rather than trying to separate "other religions" from "new-age religions". Without a definition of what this means (and the 2022 site doesn't have any additional details), we should group "New age" into "other". Walt Yoder (talk) 22:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Why was the data changed in the first place? This PRRI one seems very odd in percentages compared to the Pew Research graph, again, the 6% New Age and furthermore 1% Buddhism (I believe 1%, I just remembering seeing it) was marked on there, compared to Islam, which there is an actual viewable presence of in areas like Fargo or Grand Forks yet wasn't even on the graph by my memory. Los Pobre (talk) 01:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Dakota del Norte" listed at Redirects for discussion

File:Information.svg The redirect Dakota del Norte has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Template:Slink until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 16:13, 10 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

European exploration and colonization

The fourth paragraph of this section reads: "The northwestern portion of the state, corresponding to the Red River Valley...was part of Rupert's Land." It should read "northeastern portion of the state." 2600:8806:9024:6C00:51BC:FBB7:95D4:BDB3 (talk) 16:15, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply