Talk:Nazi Party

1. Redirect Template:Dated maintenance category

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 February 2025

Template:Edit extended-protected How bout you just drop the "far right" portion? Because that's horse shit and most historians teach that Nazism is simply center authoritarian. Sincerely, a man who turned the opportunity for phD in history because that's a waste of time. 2600:381:CFA0:1BF6:E371:B8D7:6B0F:112E (talk) 03:38, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

File:X mark.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 04:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Indeed. If "most historians teach that Nazism is simply center authoritarian" then the available reliable sources would already indicate that very clearly, but they do not. And anyone who didn't consider studying history "a waste of time" would already understand that, probably.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:51, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Nazism was far-right. Their ideologies, beliefs, and practices are all significantly more in line with right-wing politics than left-wing or centrist ones. drdr150 Yell at me Spy on me 20:40, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

He was in the center of ‘preserving all of humanity’ and destroying all of humanity’. Hope this helps! <3 Imagery 78 (talk) 03:58, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

No clue what you're trying to get at here. This edit request is months old. drdr150 Yell at me Spy on me 11:08, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Calling the National Socialist Party "far-right" only shows that Wikipedia is Leftist.

Fascism is neither left or right but Socialism is always left. Citing others doing the same does not change the facts. Wikipedia must have a proper neutral achidemic tone; It should not be a place for editors personal point of view. If this is a controversy, then report on it rather than taking a biased position. The truth of this question can be found in the NAZI government's social policies not in what Leftists say. Calling authoritarian government right wing perverts all historic ideas of authority vs. personal freedom. Tyrerj (talk) 04:07, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

"authoritarian government" can be right-wing or left-wing. Both are extreme and evil. Read the article and the scholarly sources that explain why Fascism, and its far-right variant known as Nazism, are right-wing, not left-wing. Study European history and the underground sabotage groups that fought the Nazis. The Communists and Socialists (both left-wing) were the most active and hated the Nazis. The Socialists also hated the Communists for being too extreme.

Also, a minor detail Template:;), but are you blind? When you opened the editing window to this page, there was a large pink notice:

Nazism is a far-right ideology.

The consensus of political scientists, historians, and other reliable sources is that Nazism is a far-right ideology and not a left-wing or far-left one. This has been discussed numerous times. Please see this FAQ and read the talk page archives.

Please do not request that "far-right" be changed to "left-wing" or "far-left"; your request will be denied, and you may be blocked from editing if you persist in doing so.

You are not going to change those facts without some massive help from myriad very reliable sources. Your griping here will just get you labeled as an ignorant nuisance who should be blocked. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 05:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

"neutral achidemic tone" What does "achidemic" mean? Dimadick (talk) 12:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

"personal freedom" Personal freedom is associated with liberalism, liberalism's obsession with liberty, and the group of ideologies representing Centrism. Right-wing politics are associated with reactionary thought and a support for aristocracy. Dimadick (talk) 12:14, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Incorrect terminology

OP was blocked. No need to waste any more time on this.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
People have too many opinions and too few factual things to say. The title must be changed to National Socialism just like "Communist" shouldn't be titled "Commie" just because some people feel entitled to opinionate this issue. "Nazism" is the derogatory slang word some people choose to use, not the name of the ideology. If anything; "Nazism" should link to "National Socialism", and not the other way around. Complete segments are outright opinions and not facts. For example "During Hitler's rise to power in 1930s Europe, it was frequently referred to as Hitler Fascism (German: Hitlerfaschismus)" This assertion is not rooted in reality which is why it lacks citations. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be administrated by the suburbs of Tel Aviv, but by unbiased people who are able to put aside their emotions. The entry on National Socialism is so flawed and incorrect that it's now completely divorced from reality. The entire entry should be rewritten by people who are actually interested in history and endeavors to at least pretend to care about honesty. SonsofGod-Dresden (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC) You clearly did not read the page or even glance at the citations. Hitlerfaschismus is found in many contemporary accounts. Historians use the term Nazism which is why Wikipedia does. Binksternet (talk) 20:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC) Well, We should take into consideration that the word "Nazi" was made as a way of mocking the National Socialists of Germany. Specifically the Hitler Reich. But Westerners and English people used it as the formal way of talking about National Socialists. I am just adding on. TofpFL (talk) 21:30, 1 April 2025 (UTC) You obviously are unaware of English language usage. Virtually all sources, both popular and academic, in English use "Nazi Party" (and Nazis, Nazism, Nazi Germany, etc). It is absolutely nothing like "Commie" in that respect. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 19:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC) "Wikipedia isn't supposed to be administrated by the suburbs of Tel Aviv"???? This kind of antisemitic slur has no place here. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:22, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

The Parteiadler shown is incorrect, the following is the Parteiadler

The image showing the eagle clutching the wreathed swastika is based on the Reichsadler and is inaccurate, it is a mirrored image of the Reichsadler. The Parteiadler looked different than the Reichsadler, here is the Parteiadler:

File:Parteiadler Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (1933–1945) (andere).svg

Since I cannot edit the article someone with the authorization can replace the existing image claiming to be the Parteiadler with this image that is the actual Parteiadler. ImageUploader12345 (talk) 02:21, 11 May 2025 (UTC)