Talk:Navier–Stokes equations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 March by Tenpop421 in topic remove self-promotion of Jos Stam
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Template:WikiProject banner shell Template:Annual Readership Template:Merged-from

  1. REDIRECT Template:Archives

User:MiszaBot/config

Incohorent edits by Qinj

User:Qinj appears to keep adding stream-of-conciousness incoherent text to the page. Fixed current damage, likely more to come.

remove self-promotion of Jos Stam

remove chapter: Navier–Stokes equations use in games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.206.223.58 (talk) 14:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Removed as WP:UNDUE. Tenpop421 (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Logical errors in derivations

In two places (sections: General continuum equations, and Continuity equation for incompressible fluid) this article equates volume integrals to their integrands, without providing any justification or explanation. Lacshoet (talk) 15:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

You are correct. This is an error. I will try to correct this.TMM53 (talk) 05:39, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Integral equations were corrected.TMM53 (talk) 03:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Departure from continuum model?

You say "The Navier–Stokes equations assume that the fluid being studied is a continuum (it is infinitely divisible and not composed of particles such as atoms or molecules)," but then, "When the flow is incompressible, ρ does not change for any fluid particle, "

Could the late introduction of a fluid particle suggest a departure from a strictly continuum-based fluid model? Gpsanimator (talk) 03:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)Reply