Talk:NIFTY 50

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 April 2025 by Skratata69 in topic Index changes
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis

Script error: No such module "Old XfD multi".

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

What should be considered a major fall/gain?

While 10% or so is considered a correction, if we are documenting single day crashes/rises and not over many months, I feel a threshold of 2.00% is good enough. Skratata69 (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Be bold.
As seen on the list, a 2% dip or rebound happens all the time.
Plus, consider 14 Feb 2022, -3.06%, followed by 15 Feb 2022, +3.03%!
And 3 June 2024, -3.25%, then 4 June 2024, +5.93%, then 5 June 2024, +3.36%!! Net effect zero. Blink and you miss it. It's just natural volatility, not a crash. Question if any of these events are notable.
Don't get me started on "Probable Reason"!
Finally, an up-to-date graph would be better than a long table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.60.61 (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Index changes

  1. REDIRECT Template:Reply to

Template:Redirect category shell Per MOS:COLLAPSE, Collapsed or auto-collapsing cells or sections may be used with tables if they simply repeat information covered in the main text (or are purely supplementary, e.g., several past years of statistics in collapsed tables for comparison with a table of uncollapsed current stats). The unwieldy list of index changes is purely supplementary to the Constituents section directly above it which includes a column for "Date added". There is absolutely no reason the table should begin from 2009, when a full list of changes from 1996 is available on the Nifty Indices website. Also, what "looks better" is subjective and beside the point here. Yuvaank (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sure @Yuvaank, thanks for pointing it out. I will revert my changes. And will play around and try to make it look better. Skratata69 (talk) 06:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
By does not look better, I mean this doesn't really look great when the entire section is for index changes. It would make more sense if it was not a separate section and was included in other paragraphs/section
File:Image-skratata69-1.png
And the article is not that long enough yet that collapsible sections are needed. Skratata69 (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)Reply