Talk:NIFTY 50

What should be considered a major fall/gain?

While 10% or so is considered a correction, if we are documenting single day crashes/rises and not over many months, I feel a threshold of 2.00% is good enough. Skratata69 (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Be bold.

As seen on the list, a 2% dip or rebound happens all the time.

Plus, consider 14 Feb 2022, -3.06%, followed by 15 Feb 2022, +3.03%!

And 3 June 2024, -3.25%, then 4 June 2024, +5.93%, then 5 June 2024, +3.36%!! Net effect zero. Blink and you miss it. It's just natural volatility, not a crash. Question if any of these events are notable.

Don't get me started on "Probable Reason"!

Finally, an up-to-date graph would be better than a long table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.60.61 (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Index changes

Template:Ping Per MOS:COLLAPSE, Template:Xt The unwieldy list of index changes is purely supplementary to the Constituents section directly above it which includes a column for "Date added". There is absolutely no reason the table should begin from 2009, when a full list of changes from 1996 is available on the Nifty Indices website. Also, what "looks better" is subjective and beside the point here. Yuvaank (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Sure @Yuvaank, thanks for pointing it out. I will revert my changes. And will play around and try to make it look better. Skratata69 (talk) 06:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

By does not look better, I mean this doesn't really look great when the entire section is for index changes. It would make more sense if it was not a separate section and was included in other paragraphs/section

File:Image-skratata69-1.png

And the article is not that long enough yet that collapsible sections are needed. Skratata69 (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)