Talk:Motorola 68000
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Motorola 68000 Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:TmboxTemplate:Template other Template:WikiProject banner shell User:MiszaBot/config
Error re ALUs
The PC/3270 imformation states that its main processor was a 68000 with microprogram changed to execute IBM360 code. It states that the 68000 hardware is 3 16bit ALUs with multiple 16-bit register files. 2 ALUs and 2 reg files are joined as the "32-bit" data unit and 1 ALU and 16bit reg file is for address calculation. (Most address offset instructions are 16bit offsets.). Internal data buses are 16-bit which more precisely indicates CPU class. Its design and introduction was in the PDP11 and 8086 16-bit era. Should note the limitations of the original 64-pin DIP version versus PGA and flatpack versions (extra address and control pins). TaylorLeem (talk) 20:55, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Presumably by "PC/3270" you mean "XT/370" (the IBM 3270 was a line of terminals, and there were IBM PC models with communication hardware and terminal emulation software to emulate a 3270, which is what a "PC/3270" would be). The article just says:
- Template:Quote
- Is there some issue with that particular claim? Or is the issue with the description of the 68000 hardware in general?
- What the article states about the 68000 hardware is
- Template:Quote
- so it states that the hardware is 3 16-bit ALUs with 32-bit registers, which is the case, other than the two "16-bit ALUs used mostly for addresses" being just AUs, not capable of doing logical (bitwise) operations.
- A Byte Magazine article by somebody from Motorola says that
- Template:Quote
- so, no, there isn't "1 ALU and 16bit reg file ... for address calculation". The A registers are 32-bit, just like the D registers, so if they're implemented with two 16-bit halves (so that the two halves can be separately run through 16-bit ALUs/AUs and data paths), two halves are joined to make data registers and two halves are joined to make arithmetic registers. Furthermore, there is only one ALU for data operations, and there are two AUs for address operations; address offsets might be mostly 16-bit, but addresses are 32-bit until they get chopped to 24 bits when they leave the chip.
- Were there any PGA or flatpack versions of the 68000? There was a PGA version of the Motorola 68010, the Motorola 68012, which did have more address pins, so that 31 bits of address could be provided external to the chip. Guy Harris (talk) 21:23, 23 May 2021 (UTC)