Talk:Mother goddess
Template:Category handlerScript error: No such module "Copied".
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mother goddess Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
POV in "Prehistoric matriarchy debate" section
The current version of this section is biased. There is widespread evidence of matrilineal elite genealogy and property transfers in early human societies. What is up for debate is the *extent* of such "matriarchal" relations in prehistoric times. The POV in this section takes a black-and-white perspective and just says, without source, "In academic circles, this prehistoric matriarchy is considered unlikely." ignoring evidence to the contrary and smearing all opponents of this view (a diverse range of perspectives) as followers of the "Goddess movement."
I am not an expert on this subject but it strongly seems to me that there is a lively academic debate on this subject and this section would benefit from clarification of opposing views, and being rewritten from an unbiased perspective. 76.21.38.200 (talk) 19:49, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- "it strongly seems to me that there is a lively academic debate on this subject" I have no idea. My few books on the subject date to the 1970s and 1980s. Are you aware of more recent publications on the subject matter? Dimadick (talk) 09:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)