Talk:Morphometrics

Possible addition of information

I was thinking about how more information could possibly added to the Applications section of this article? Maybe another application that can be included in the applications section could talk about how some scientists can use morphometrics in the study of cladogenesis and how possibly new species have grown from current species and how closely they are related by their appearances. Any thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthur.181 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Some notes

No matter — ignore and delete.

No article? sunja 06:46, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Sun. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.152.44.10 (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Morphometrics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added Template:Tlx tag to http://dinosaurs.nhm.org/staff/pdf/1999Qiang_et_al.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080413142401/http://cse.naro.affrc.go.jp/iwatah/shape/ to http://cse.naro.affrc.go.jp/iwatah/shape/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

“Suture” link in landmark-based section

The link from the word "suture" under the heading "landmark-based morphometrics" leads to Suture (geology) rather than Suture (anatomy) 96.76.249.209 (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Agree that geology is probably not the right kind of suture. Fixed. Squeakachu (talk) 18:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)