Talk:Minyan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 22 November 2023 by 71.112.194.9 in topic Source for mentioning Gen 18 here
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config Template:Archives

Harlan Ellison: I'm looking for Kadak

Is a terrifically funny story that touches on most of the points of this article regarding who can be considered in the makeup of a minyan.

http://harlanellison.com/herc.htm

Approaching Oblivion

Golems

In the mid-17th century, the Chacham Tzvi asked whether a golem could be a member of a minyan. His answer was "no". Should this be mentioned in the article? Jhobson1 (talk) 17:37, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Use of "extraneous" on this page

The word "extraneous" is used in several places on this page where it makes little sense, e.g.,

"...in extraneous [sic] circumstances there are those who are lenient and permit a minor over six years...."

The word "extraordinary" is the intended meaning in all cases, isn't it? -- John W. Pierce (talk) 21:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes. A word needed for the phrase Beshas Ha'dechak: A time of great need, pressing circumstances; sometimes extenuating circumstances is used. Chesdovi (talk) 10:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minyan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Source for mentioning Gen 18 here

What is the source for "The minimum of 10 Jews needed for a meeting has its origin in Abraham's prayer to God in Genesis 18:20"? The idea that a minyan is related to counting "righteous" people is deeply problematic and not supported by the places in Talmud where quorum is discussed. Maybe there is midrash on this. But, if so, it should be cited here. Students of basic Judaism are confused by this unsupported statement. Virginia Avniel (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

https://www.sefaria.org/Midrash_Tanchuma%2C_Miketz.6.5?lang=bi 71.112.194.9 (talk) 02:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)Reply