Talk:Middle Temple

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 June 2017 by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

Untitled

I cut the statement "where barristers receive their training". I presume that was meant to refer to MT rather than the RCJ, but in either case it's not really true. Training is a fairly minor part of MT's activities. Markalexander100 03:52, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I have been a member of the MT since 1980 and I have no recollection of the provision of subsidised accommodation. Is there a source for this statement? --ukexpat 18:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Added - the MT website. Bencherlite 19:19, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Photos

I removed the photos request. Do we now have enough photos? - The Blackfriar 13:39, 7 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Logical Contradiction

This page describes the Middle Temple as a "Royal Peculiar"; however, that wiki page says it is an extra-diocesan (but not Royal) Peculiar. I have no idea which is correct, but they can't both be. Could someone clarify and fix that? Thanks. Msalt (talk) 17:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The article Extra-parochial_area also refers to it as a Royal Peculiar. And obviously we want tne Inner_Temple article to correspond.Msalt (talk) 17:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Eminent Members and Benchers

I wonder whether this section is ripe for review?

It has become something of a disparate list of members and former members. Fame is a relative concept. A person who might be of note in one part of the world, might not be of note elsewhere. Where does the list logically stop?

I note that the article on Inner Temple adopts a far more restrained approach to the question of listing former members.

Do bare lists have any place on Wikipedia?

I am posting similar observations in the discussions pages of the other two Inns of Court.

Informed Owl (talk) 12:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Informed OwlReply


Correct that! I see that the page for Gray's Inn has a separate link to a page specifically listing former members. Although the observation remains as to the use of such a page, is it perhaps an option for this article?

Informed Owl (talk) 12:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Informed OwlReply

That would tidy things up nicely; if a user is interested it's only a click away. --Old Moonraker (talk) 14:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have made the change. The list had become rather cumbersome and was in danger of dominating the article Informed Owl (talk) 15:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Informed OwlReply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Middle Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:03, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Middle Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Middle Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)Reply