Talk:Michael Spilotro

Untitled

if we are to keep this we shoudl say something about this man. otherwise, he can be mentioned in that article Cavebear42 04:13, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Exactly. Single-sentence substubs devoid of content are usually deleted on sight. However, reposting them once they've been deleted will get you branded as a vandal. You can kiss your editing privileges goodbye if that happens. Please consider getting a user name and doing the right thing. - Lucky 6.9 05:10, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Minor (but necessary) change

For a very obvious reason, I saved the page with the statement "Spilotro was severely beaten and buried alive", changed from the original "Spilotro was beaten to death and buried alive" O_O --SlightlyInsane 00:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

---

"Michael first met Robert in May 1954, when Robert was only 17-years-old." This can't be, as Robert Conrad was born March 1, 1930. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Conrad —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.74.23.121 (talk) 21:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Spilotro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091021043704/http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/Family.Secrets.Chicago.2.338800.html to http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/Family.Secrets.Chicago.2.338800.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Ages in the Hole in the Wall Gang section

Having what appear to be ages of certain people mentioned in this section does not make any sense, given (1) no specific time period is mentioned and (2) the ages of most others are not included. They probably should be deleted. JonathanGaloola (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2025 (UTC)