Talk:Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Untitled
I have read that the name could be MLK-Class
MLKX
Is "MLKX-Class" a typo or what? --SFoskett July 1, 2005 18:33 (UTC)
- Obviously it's a typo.
- Well if the guy wanted to move to MLK-Class, and forgot to remove the X, once the move is validated it is difficult to undo, so it could still be a typo, sort of ... Hektor 19:47, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- So How to move this to Mercedes-Benz MLK-Class ?
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. From Mercedes-Benz MLKX-Class to Mercedes-Benz MLK-Class. –Hajor 19:50, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this article be called Mercedes-Benz X-Class because DaimlerChrysler said that hey're preparing to use "X-Class", and you people should always listen to the company that makes the automobile, rather than some newspaper or magazine or site saying that it should be called MLK-Class. Anyone agree? File:Flag of Montenegro.svg CrnaGora (Talk | Contribs | E-mail) 02:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- Mercedes has registered the GLK name in July 2005, and the name GLK 63 in March 2006Hektor 21:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC).
this is a Spam! according to the last auto motor, the car still calld mercedes-benz MLK
- Automotive News has announced that Mercedes-Benz has officially confirmed that the name will be GLK. Hektor 10:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
2010?
"It is set for release in the United States at early 2010." I believe this line is incorrect. It is set for release in the U.S. in early 2009, not 2010. Besides, the info column says: Production 2008- . 67.171.172.44 (talk) 01:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Ad Copy
The section of saftey reads like it was taken right off of a Mercedes Benz brochure. It needs a rewrite. Andacar (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/66DUksvJD?url=http://www.4x4news.de/2008/01/03/erste-bilder-vom-neuen-kleinen-mercedes-suv-vision-glk-freeside/ to http://www.4x4news.de/2008/01/03/erste-bilder-vom-neuen-kleinen-mercedes-suv-vision-glk-freeside/
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130122135809/http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Jul08/15_001258_The_Mercedes_Benz_GLK_Class_Design.html to http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Jul08/15_001258_The_Mercedes_Benz_GLK_Class_Design.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121023032654/http://dreamcargarage.com/dreamcargarage/501 to http://dreamcargarage.com/dreamcargarage/501
- Added archive https://archive.is/20170222134726/http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Jul08/15_001261_The_Mercedes_Benz_GLK_Class_Active_And_Passive_Safety.html to http://www.emercedesbenz.com/Jul08/15_001261_The_Mercedes_Benz_GLK_Class_Active_And_Passive_Safety.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130119034713/http://chiefmarketer.com/entertainmentmarketing/mercedes_benz_sex_city_0507 to http://chiefmarketer.com/entertainmentmarketing/mercedes_benz_sex_city_0507
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)